Maarvyx Engineering
Requirements, safety analyses and traceability, drafted with the standard in view. For automotive and embedded teams working to ISO 26262 and ASPICE.
Why this field
Software-defined vehicles have multiplied the requirements, safety analyses and trace links a team must produce and keep consistent. ISO 26262 and Automotive SPICE decide what “done” means, and assessors check every work product.
Much of that effort goes into first drafts and consistency checks: rewriting ambiguous requirements, walking hazard lists, finding the requirement with no test. That is exactly the work an AI can draft and a qualified engineer can verify quickly.
Maarvyx Engineering builds AI workflows that sit alongside the ALM tools teams already use, rather than replacing them.
What we are building
Requirement quality review
Flags ambiguous, untestable or compound requirements and suggests rewrites, with the reason for each.
HARA and FMEA first drafts
Candidate hazards, failure modes and ratings drafted from the item definition, for the safety team to review and rate.
Traceability gap reports
Requirements without tests, tests without requirements, and orphaned safety goals, from a ReqIF or spreadsheet export.
Assessment preparation
Checks work products against the ASPICE base practices before an assessor does.
How we keep it safe
- Assistive by design: every output is reviewed by an engineer, so the tool stays at a low confidence level under ISO 26262-8 tool qualification.
- Runs on your own hardware when your design data cannot leave your network.
- Works with your existing tools through standard exports (ReqIF, spreadsheets), without lock-in.
Products
MaarvReq
PlannedRequirement quality review, first drafts of HARA and FMEA, and trace-gap reports that work alongside your existing ALM tool and run on your own hardware.
Join early access
We are choosing a small number of design partners for Maarvyx Engineering. Tell us what you do and which part of your workflow takes the most time.
contact@maarvyx.com